This is topic They call this guy a "HUNTER" in forum Member forum at The New Huntmastersbbs!.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://www.huntmastersbbs.com/cgi-bin/cgi-ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=000477

---

Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on November 22, 2004, 08:52 AM:
 
Some immigrant Hmung "person" trespasses, shoots eight property owners asking him to leave, killing five, and the Media is calling this a dispute between hunters. And, they are not willing to guess just who might have shot first?

Hunters will suffer over this. The loonies are already on the message boards, claiming it was deserved for killing defenseless deer.

I watched an interview where the shrink thought that people needed to be evaluated before being authorized to carry weapons.

These type of things really make me angry!

Good hunting. LB
 

---

Posted by brad h (Member # 57) on November 22, 2004, 09:26 AM:
 
POS liberal tree huggers!

Their hobbies and activities consist only of being in other people's business! That's what pisses me off.

Some people need to be evaluated before bieng allowed to breathe.

Brad
 

---

Posted by Blak coyote (Member # 415) on November 22, 2004, 10:58 AM:
 
Well Communist News Network(CNN),just had a thing on it,and they had a legal analyst on there talking about how do you know what kind of people do this and how they aquire guns or even hunting licenses.They said surely something will need to be done to prevent things like this from happening again.

My guess is WI. is going to become a staging ground for the Anti-gun agenda,they'll probably start making every hunter take a phsycological evaluation before you can buy a license or firearm.One thing I've noticed through the years putting the firearms issue aside and not meaning to sound racist in the least,but there have problems with the Hmong population when it comes to game laws and property.I know on the the piers on some of lake michigans shoreline there have been disputes with these people over fishing spots,with them feeling they own certain spots.I've seen articles in the paper over the years pertaining to game violations with these people also,I think they come from a different lifestyle and are having difficulty adjusting to our laws,and must realize this is how it is here.I know all the facts arent in yet,but would be willing to bet the guy just doesnt comprehend private property,and felt he had the right to be there because he was there first,on top of just being a nutcase.It'll be interesting how this plays out in court and how the defense will play this.
Another thing is some are wondering why they didnt shoot back.

I think it's gotten to the point where our politically correct society and judicial system has crippled the ability for a person to justifiably protect himself with deadly force,leaving you second guessing yourself and the situation at hand.Because of the repucussions that will befall you if you do protect yourself.So in the end the vitim remains the victim and the suspect gets a fair trial,while the dead get no 2nd chance,and said defendant gets some reduced sentence with a bunch of legal wrangling.If you defend yourself,the defendant lies and gets it turned around on you,getting you into legal trouble,and himself less of a sentence,basically dragging you down with him.
So in the end you get the liberals jumping on the bandwagon demanding the government do something about all this,and eventually giving away more rights and turning everything into a government dependant society.This whole thing has opened a can of worms,and the repucussions to follow will no doubt affect us all,and the victims will probably jump on the bandwagon of anti-assault weapons so this doesnt happen to anyone else.Although my heart and prayers goes out to the vitims and there families,I feel this is going to be twisted around with feelings instead of the fact that a nutcase went bannas plain and simple.But it probably wont play out that way with what has been plastered on the news.

[ November 22, 2004, 11:01 AM: Message edited by: Blak coyote ]
 

---

Posted by Leonard (Member # 2) on November 22, 2004, 11:27 AM:
 
See, this is how the media spins these things.

As I said, several accounts mentioned that it was not known; who shot first?

Another article said only one victim had a firearm.

Another thing mentioned was that the "hunter" had fired twenty rounds, and had no more ammo, when he was arrested.

Now, I ask you; from what sort of antigun bias did the statement come from..."didn't know WHO had shot first"?

Give me a break!

Good hunting. LB
 

---

Posted by Blak coyote (Member # 415) on November 22, 2004, 10:08 PM:
 
Here's the latest,the 6th victim dies.Here's a link to the story.The suspect hasnt confessed yet.It will be interesting on how this plays out,notice how the story kinda plays it soft on the suspect.
6th hunter dies

quote:

---

Now, I ask you; from what sort of antigun bias did the statement come from..."didn't know WHO had shot first"?

---

UBB.classic^TM 6.3.0