|
Author
|
Topic: Most Kalifornicated?
|
NASA
Knows what it's all about
Member # 177
|
posted November 08, 2006 08:22 AM
It looks like AZ has more homo-loving Cali’s than CO. AZ voted to allow same sex marriage. Watch yer’ backside you brokeback coyote callers. That might not be a cactus spine pokin' you in the arse. ![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
CO rejected a measure that would allow homo couples the rights and privileges of married hetro couples. CO also approved a measure to Constitutionally declare that the only marriage recognized by law is between a man and a woman. Other States banning queers getting married were Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia and Wisconsin.
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
Posts: 1168 | From: Typical White Person | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Andy L
HI, I'M THE NEW MODERATOR OF THE CENTRAL MISSOURI FORUM, PULL MY FINGER!
Member # 642
|
posted November 08, 2006 08:47 AM
MO did that last election. Fags cant marry. Thats why I always thought this was a moral state. But now you can "farm" human life and kill it for research.
So much for the morals. ![[Mad]](mad.gif)
--------------------
Andy
Posts: 2645 | From: Central Missouri | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Tim Behle
Administrator MacNeal Sector
Member # 209
|
posted November 08, 2006 10:18 AM
That just shows how fast some things can change. When I went to bed last night that Prop was showing 70% in favor of allowing marrage only between one man and one woman
--------------------
Personally, I carry a gun because I'm too young to die and too old to take
an ass kickin'.
Posts: 3160 | From: Five Miles East of Vic, AZ | Registered: Jun 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Norm
Knows what it's all about
Member # 240
|
posted November 08, 2006 05:24 PM
Tim, that was before everyone came out of the closet and voted.... the population of Phx is going to double in the next few months...
--------------------
Carpe Diem
Posts: 778 | From: Phx AZ | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Joe Manes
Knows what it's all about
Member # 686
|
posted November 08, 2006 05:56 PM
I voted for that proposition but I was very dismayed by the wording of it.
It actually was worded in such a manner that it would have denied public entities from granting benefits to "domestic parteners". And I know plenty of unmarried hetro couples that fall into that category, (I is one myself) ![[Wink]](wink.gif) Now niether of us work for the public but if we did, we'd be out.
There was a thing on the web, Ill see if I can find the link later, but it was a survey of the people in the US, and what they thought of marriage.
A lot of the hetro respondents didnt think that marriage as we know it still meant what it used to, or that it had value to them as couples.
Im not so sure I dont agree.
Times change.
But framing that survey against this law is interesting.
Why do the homosexual couples wish so bad for a tradition that is sliding into obsolecense? HEHE!]
Never use a rapier when a scalpel will do.
[ November 08, 2006, 05:57 PM: Message edited by: Joe Manes ]
Posts: 31 | From: Phoenix | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
